We urgently need more Personal Case Workers – can you help?

UMUCU currently has a shortage of Personal Case Workers – volunteers, who after undergoing some basic training, support UMUCU members facing problems at work. 

Typical situations where a member might need support are: 

  • Defending themselves against an allegation of misconduct 
  • Submitting a complaint about bullying 
  • Requesting that ‘reasonable adjustments’ are put in place 
  • Dealing with work related stress 
  • Defending themselves against an allegation of poor performance 

You don’t need to be an expert on everything in order to become a Personal Case Worker. You can start by focussing on a single type of problem, only moving onto other areas once you feel ready. There is always support and advice available from existing, experienced case workers. Most members are so glad to have someone helping them through a difficult situation that they don’t mind if you can’t answer every question immediately and sometimes need to seek advice from a case worker colleague. 

Please email ucu@manchester.ac.uk if you’re interested in finding out more. 

Message from national UCU regarding the UK Supreme Court Ruling

Image courtesy of https://openclipart.org/share

Stand Up, Speak Out: Branch Actions to Defend Trans and Non-Binary Rights After the UK Supreme Court Ruling

Following our recent statement, [list.mercury.ucu.org.uk] We are pleased to provide some provisional guidance for branches on responding to the UK supreme court’s ruling [list.mercury.ucu.org.uk] in your workplaces.

We have 2 key messages: 

1. Universities and colleges should avoid making hasty or permanent policy changes that may impact on other protected characteristics under the Equality Act or the dignity and respect that must be afforded to trans and non-binary people.  

2. Everyone can play a part in reassuring trans and non-binary staff and students that your institution values their full inclusion and respects who they are. 

While the ruling maintains protections against discrimination for transgender individuals, it raises concerns about the broader impact on their rights and dignity. As a union, we will push back strongly against this together. 

UCU’s Commitment 

We stand firmly with our trans and non-binary members, reaffirming our dedication to equality, inclusion, and respect for all individuals. We are prepared to challenge any legal interpretations or implementations that infringe upon the rights of our trans and non-binary colleagues. 

Calls to Action for Union Branches 

  • Prepare to contribute to the full consultation: We expect the consultation to open in May. We will be in touch when we get more details with advice on a response.  
  • Check in with Trans and Non-Binary Colleagues: Reach out to offer support, listen to concerns, and ensure that our workplaces remain inclusive and affirming environments. 
  • Demonstrate Visible Support: Display symbols of solidarity, such as inclusive flags or badges, and participate in events that promote trans and non-binary inclusion. 
  • Educate and Advocate: Organise workshops and discussions to educate members about the implications of the ruling and to advocate for policies that uphold the rights of all individuals, regardless of gender identity. 
  • Promote Donations to the Good Law Project [list.mercury.ucu.org.uk]: Encourage members to support the Good Law Project’s efforts to protect trans rights by making donations. Their work is crucial in challenging legal decisions that may negatively impact the trans and non-binary community.  

As we navigate the implications of this ruling, UCU remains committed to creating spaces where every member feels valued and protected. We will continue to monitor developments and provide guidance to ensure that our collective actions uphold the principles of equality and justice for all. 

For further information or to get involved in advocacy efforts, please contact eqadmin@ucu.org.uk  

UMUCU strongly condemns the Labour government’s immigration white paper

The University of Manchester UCU strongly condemns the Labour government’s immigration white paper, published on 12th May. The white paper proposes, amongst other changes, to lengthen the pathway to settlement from five to ten years; to raise the salary threshold for skilled worker visas; to shorten the graduate work visa from 2-3 years to 18 months; and to introduce greater surveillance of international students.


Since 2009, successive Labour and Conservative governments have created an increasingly hostile environment for migrant staff and students. This has thrown lives and plans into upheaval whilst fanning the flames of racism and xenophobia. Amidst the increasing precarity of the HE sector at large, migrant students face cripplingly high visa and tuition fees, regular scrutiny of their attendance, restrictions on their ability to work, and separation from their dependents. Migrant staff face heightened scrutiny at work because their visa status is often tied to their employer. Beyond the university, migrants are profiled in a wide range of everyday activities, from opening a bank account to renting a flat. The hostile environment is particularly severe for racially minoritised migrants and those from the global South.


This government, like its predecessors, now proposes to make the UK an even less welcoming, more brutal place for migrant staff and students. In so doing, it has already spread fear and dismay amongst migrants who are uncertain how the new rules might affect their status.


We call for the national UCU to listen to and support migrant staff and students in its public statements and policy, for universities to oppose the hostile environment, and for the government to rescind the immigration white paper.

Open letter supporting Trans Rights – being circulated by UoM colleagues

If you are concerned by the recent Supreme Court ruling about the definitions of women and men, and you would like to state your support for trans rights and inclusion in education and research, please sign this open letter:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UZmaZ4QCXU-b-NcBManyo9-AIZtQlxLDWpTP09goaiY/edit?usp=sharing

Note that this letter is for cisgender people to show that most of us do not feel threatened or uncomfortable with transgender people being in single-sex spaces and that the ruling was based on the views of a vocal minority. If you are a trans person I hope there are other avenues for you to have your views heard, and that you feel comfortable and supported in our workplace.

Also see Duncan Ivison’s recent statement on the matter for the University’s position and some suggested support resources.

Message from a UMUCU member to Duncan Ivison following his response to the recent Supreme Court ruling

“President/Vice-Chancellor Ivison,

Your message sent on 25 April Our resolute commitment to equality and inclusion – A message following the Supreme Court ruling last week (16 April) is fundamentally inadequate, as it entirely fails to address the very immediate practical concerns of trans staff and students on campus.  The ruling has legal implications for sex-segregated toilet facilities, with guidance circulating that would prohibit trans people from using either men’s or women’s facilities.  I understand that there is a great deal of uncertainty surrounding the implementation of policy following the ruling, and that sorting through the guidance and determining the University’s response takes time.  However, as a trans member of staff, I cannot wait for “the coming weeks” — I will need to use the toilet whilst at work much sooner than that.

If I use a sex-segregated toilet on campus tomorrow, what actions (if any) could or would be taken against me by the University?  What enforcement mechanisms are currently in place?  Again, I understand the current state of uncertainty around the legal issues here, but in the interim I do need to know what precisely I am risking in popping to the nearest loo between meetings, so that I can weigh that risk accordingly.  This isn’t a question of “feeling anxious or concerned”, it’s information that I need to make decisions about my schedule and time mangement in fulfilling my contractual obligations at work.  I am aware that there are some toilet facilities on campus that are not sex-segregated, and therefore unambiguous in legal status — where can I find a list of the locations of these facilities?  (As these are facilities that already exist, requiring no change in policy, the message sent should have included this information among the resources listed.  The fact that the only guidance offered to trans colleagues was surrounding emotional/mental health shows a clear disregard for the actual, practical realities of inclusion, beyond vague commitment to an abstract ideal.)”

UCU statement following Supreme Court ruling on the legal definition of a woman

A message from Unite members employed by UCU

Dear UCU member

As we begin taking a full week of strike action from today, we wanted to put the record straight on what our employer has been reporting to you and your members about our dispute.

Every trade union member knows that when their branch goes into dispute and starts to take industrial action, the employer’s propaganda machine starts churning out disinformation to damage and undermine action. It is important that you are aware of the facts behind the employer’s rhetoric so we have published a ‘UCU SMT Myth Busting [uniteucu.wordpress.com]’ page on our website.

But beyond this, what you may not know is that UCU management is proactively exacerbating the dispute and undermining the possibility of finding a resolution through a series of union-busting actions that wouldn’t be unknown among the most hawkish of your employers: 

  • they’re employing non-unionised fixed-term/agency staff to cover striking workers, and are outsourcing other work
  • they’re openly crossing picket lines themselves, covering the work of striking staff, and are suggesting core teams are functioning normally
  • they’re circulating misleading propaganda, which accuses our negotiators of acting in bad faith
  • they’re threatening Unite members with disciplinary action if they mention strike action in out-of-office email messages so as to reduce wider awareness of our action
  • they’re targeting a number of branch committee members and leading activists through repeated abuse of agreed policies and procedures
  • they have breached our recognition agreement through recognising another union for managers.

It is beyond sad that we are in this situation. Our density is over 65%, which represents many dedicated and long-serving members with an enormous wealth of experience working for UCU branches and members. They are simply no longer able to properly do their jobs and are leaving UCU employment at an alarming rate.

Some of our matters in dispute could be close to resolution – or at least could be making enough meaningful progress that Unite action would be unnecessary – which makes management’s refusal to talk to us all the more incomprehensible. 

But the major sticking points, about which they are silent, are the safety and work-related stress crisis [uniteucu.wordpress.com], and now, their attacks on Unite branch officers [uniteucu.wordpress.com] which are further undermining our broken industrial relations.

In the coming days and weeks we will be reaching out again and providing opportunities for you to speak with us, ask questions and demonstrate the support so many of you have openly offered. 

We want to build this union into one that can best deliver for UCU members, one that is safe for its staff and one that allows us to support you in the best and most effective ways we know how. One in which both the union and its staff can thrive.

Thank you for reading

Unite UCU (LE127)